Who Needs PageRank Prediction Tools?

Google PageRank Prediction Tools are for the birds! Who needs PageRank Prediction Tools when you can check for LIVE PageRank Updates at Raketforskning.com. A special thanks goes out to Eches for showing me a place where I can check for Live PageRank Updates. In his article I also learned that Google is in the process of updating their PageRank system. So after reading this article, you might want to spread the word around to your buddies. Google is officially doing their January PageRank Updates. Also while you have a moment, take a moment to visit Eches blog… there is some really good content and articles over there.

Published on January 10th, 2007 by Garry Conn | About Me | Join Free Mailing List |

Some Related Posts You Might Be Interested In

  1. Google Ranking Tip, PageRank Prediction Tools Explained - It seems that people put a lot of value in their site's Google PageRank. I do too... to be honest....
  2. PageRank Predictor Is Broken - It seems that with the increased popularity of the famous iWebtool PageRank Predictor might have died. I have been testing...
  3. Google PageRank Update Coping Skills - Google updates their PageRank what seems like around once every four months. When this happens, the blogosphere, mainly the MMO...
  4. Google PageRank Updates For Jan 2008 - It seem that Google has updated PageRank again. Garry Conn dot Com went from a PR5 to a PR4. I...
  5. Increase Google Rankings with Google Webmaster Tools Explained - Have you been wondering about Google Webmaster Tools? What is it? What does it do? How can it help...

Related Keyword Tags:

RSS feed| Trackback URI

8 Comments»

eches Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-10-2007 01:11:34 Comment #84

Hey Garry,

Thanks for the backlink. I owe you one. nope, two actually ;) Will return those in the near future :)

 
eches Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-10-2007 01:13:25 Comment #85

lol 3 actually..

 
Garry Conn Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-10-2007 01:31:05 Comment #86

Hey… that’s cool!

Most important thing is we have migrated quite a bit of content together and these are things that look great when Google indexes a site. Google likes content, links, and activity! and that is something we have between our two sites now… and if we continue it gets even better…

The more people you can mix content, links, and activity with like we have been doing, the better…

 
Tom Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-10-2007 08:07:10 Comment #87

A better tool for checking PageRanks is at: http://www.digpagerank.com
As for PR prediction tools, they serve to guide webmasters on their link building strategy. They take into a account MSN, Yahoo and Alta Vista (although not Google) links that have been recently added to your site. They do have a purpose, but too many webmasters stress over them unnecessarily. In my experience they on predict correctly half of the time!

 
Garry Conn Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-10-2007 09:26:24 Comment #88

Hey Tom,

Thanks for the reference. It is always good to give people options. I have tested out http://www.digpagerank.com. and I don’t think it is necessarily better, but does provide a different way of reviewing PageRank.

On digpagerank, you can choose from a listing of different data centers to use. Where on Raketforskning.com, people can just quickly enter their URL into the search bar and get their results without having to choose options.

I would say either site is better, but I would say that I will use both.

Thanks for the comment and sharing the reference with us.

Also, I visited your site and subscribed to email notifications.

Garry

 
Alvin Wrote a Comment:

Date/Time: 1-24-2007 01:14:55 Comment #90

Garry, you don’t need to select any option if you want to test quickly on digpagerank. By default vibrant dc option is selected.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post